Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

respond

Evaluate and address concrete code-review feedback against repository reality.

Skill by KodingDev

IndexedMIT★ 5
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying respond?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/kodingdev-respond

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Evaluate and address concrete code-review feedback against repository reality.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/respond

What's inside

Skill name
respond
Description
Evaluate and address concrete code-review feedback against repository reality.
License
MIT
Instructions
16 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Respond

User intent, priorities, and accepted tradeoffs are authoritative. Technical explanations and proposed fixes remain claims to verify against the code and evidence.

## Process

1. Read all feedback and its surrounding diff context.
2. Separate requested outcomes from technical assertions about the cause or solution.
3. Verify each technical assertion against repository behavior, tests, and relevant documentation.
4. Apply correct in-scope fixes one at a time with focused verification.
5. Push back concisely when a suggestion is technically wrong, breaks existing behavior, conflicts with an accepted decision, or expands scope without value.
6. Report what changed, what was declined, and the evidence supporting either result.

Avoid performative agreement, but ordinary human acknowledgment is fine. If your earlier technical conclusion was wrong, correct it directly without defensive explanation.

From KodingDev/meridian, MIT.

More from KodingDev/meridian

Signals

Stars
5
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Jul 14, 2026 (3 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from KodingDev

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get respond running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying respond?

CallGet help
Cite this page

respond skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/kodingdev-respond (last updated 2026-10-24)