Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

lythoskill-project-scribe

Session context dump.

Skill by lythos-labs

IndexedMIT★ 3
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying lythoskill-project-scribe?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/lythos-labs-lythoskill-project-scribe

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Session context dump. Self-assess what the conversation contains that has NO other carrier (no task, no ADR, no epic) — pitfalls, working-tree anomalies, why-we-chose-this, specific next steps — and write to daily/YYYY-MM-DD.md. Things WITH structured carriers go to their carriers. Things WITHOUT carriers but needed by the next agent go here. Forms CQRS write-side pair with project-onboarding (read-side).

Use cases: writing, productivity, agent-building

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 26, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/lythoskill-project-scribe

What's inside

Skill name
lythoskill-project-scribe
Description
Session context dump. Self-assess what the conversation contains that has NO other carrier (no task, no ADR, no epic) — pitfalls, working-tree anomalies, why-we-chose-this, specific next steps — and write to daily/YYYY-MM-DD.md. Things WITH structured carriers go to their carriers. Things WITHOUT carriers but needed by the next agent go here. Forms CQRS write-side pair with project-onboarding (read-side).
License
MIT
Instructions
232 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Agent Skills spec issues

  • name: "lythoskill-project-scribe" does not match folder "skill"

Files (5)

  • SKILL.md
  • automation-triggers.md · references/
  • cqrs-architecture.md · references/
  • daily-template.md · references/
  • weekly-template.md · references/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Project Scribe
> Write what `ls` + `cat` + `git log` cannot recover. Skip everything else.

## Trigger: save discipline, not session-end

The intent is the old **save-to-disk discipline**: save constantly, because
a power cut can hit at any moment. For an agent the power cut is
compaction / crash / context loss: it can hit mid-task with no warning, and
only git-tracked, already-written files survive it. Scribe = save game; the
daily file is the save slot.

The reliable save anchor is a **batch of commits landing** — scribe right
after, while facts are fresh. A session cannot judge its own remaining
context; "write the handoff when the session feels done" is unreliable and
produces rushed, telegraphic output. Anchor to the commit, not the mood.

`## Session Handoff` names the artifact the NEXT session reads, not the
moment you write it. One session saves any number of times; saving says
nothing about this session ending (record-then-continue is the default,
see below).

## Value Boundary

**Scribe = session context dump for things WITHOUT structured carriers.**

```
What came out of this conversation?
  ├── Has a structured carrier (task/ADR/epic/experiment/wiki) → write
  │   to that carrier, not scribe prose — AND give the batch one Batch
  │   Index line (below)
  └── No carrier → self-assess: does the next agent need to know this?
        ├── Yes → scribe
        └── No → don't write it
```

| File exploration recovers (~70%) | Scribe must dump (~30%) |
|----------------------------------|------------------------|
| Project structure, tech stack | Pitfalls from this session |
| skill-deck.toml content | True working-tree state (prevents hallucination) |
| cortex/ tasks and epics | Why we chose A not B (not ADR-worthy but still important) |
| git log history | Specific next steps (not "test it") |
| README, docs | Temp artifacts: location + purpose |
| git diff (code changes) | Uncommitted modifications and their intent |
| | Meta-observations that emerge mid-conversation |

If the next agent can find it via `ls`, `cat`, or `git log` — don't repeat it.

### Batch Index: carriers get a line, not prose

The boundary above governs **prose, not presence**. A batch whose content
fully lives in carriers (task card + ADR + commits + demo artifacts) still
gets
exactly one line in the handoff's `### Batch Index` — because onboarding
reads the handoff first, and without that line the batch is invisible: the
carrier holds the content, but nothing tells the next agent the batch exists
or when its carrier is worth opening. Production-side completeness is
exactly what makes consumption-side absence fatal — the better a batch is
governed, the more completely it vanishes from the session narrative without
this rule. (Downstream incident: a five-carrier batch in another project
left zero trace in the handoff; the next session had to archaeologize what
the daily never said.)

**Highest-risk carriers — index these on sight.** The absence is most
fatal for batches whose carriers are quiet by nature: **experiments**
(result directories that exist on disk but are never announced) and
**research/wiki pages** (pages sitting in the tree that nobody opens).
Code batches leave diffs, trails, and review noise; experiment and wiki
batches leave files that look like background. A session that produced
either gets its index line without debate — for quiet carriers, the
`read when` trigger is the only door to the work. The paths are project
conventions, not part of the rule: name YOUR project's experiment dirs and
wiki (this repo's instances: `playground/`, `runs/`, `cortex/wiki/` —
cortex is optional, a wiki dir is whatever this project uses).

Coverage rule: **every batch that has progressed since the last handoff gets
≥1 line** — whether or not its commits have landed yet. A batch = work
toward one outcome, not each commit. Check coverage mechanically — no
relying on session recall:

```bash
git log <last-handoff-HEAD>..HEAD --oneline
```

`<last-handoff-HEAD>` = the HEAD recorded in `### 0. Verify Current State`
of the **immediately preceding handoff** — the handoff section directly
below if you're prepending to today's file, else the first handoff of the
latest earlier daily file. No prior handoff → index since session start.
"The last handoff" is never a recall question: the filename date pattern
makes it visible — the newest `daily/YYYY-MM-DD.md` (filter dated names
before sorting), first `## Session Handoff` section in it; on prepend days,
the section directly below that one. (The HEAD you record in `### 0` today
is the next handoff's `<last-handoff-HEAD>` — the chain is the freshness
contract.)

Group the commits into batches; each batch names itself in the index.
Meta-commits are not batch-bearing and need no line: the daily-file commit
itself, post-commit-hook trailer follow-ups, pure lockfile/version churn. A
batch whose carriers exist but are **not yet committed** still gets its line
— refs point at the working-tree paths, marked `uncommitted`. Write `none`
only when no batch progressed at all.

Line shape — one line per batch; details stay in the carrier, never
summarized here:

```markdown
- **<batch name, 3-8 words>** — refs: TASK-xxx, ADR-xxx, @a1b2c3 — read when: <trigger>
```

`refs` = **all carrier IDs the batch touched (TASK/ADR/EPIC/wiki) + one
representative commit hash** — not every commit in the range. If a "batch"
needs two lines to name its outcomes, it is two batches.

`read when` is a **condition, not a summary** — "when the spec-vs-registered
flow diverges again", not "about the spec-flow batch". It answers the
reader's actual question: *I have this problem now — is there prior art,
and where?*
## Pre-Handoff Checklist (mandatory before writing)
```bash
# 1. Git state — snapshot LAST: after any deck link/refresh/release step,

From lythos-labs/lythoskill, MIT.

More from lythos-labs/lythoskill

Signals

Stars
3
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Sep 10, 2026 (1 month ago)
Last release
Oct 14, 2026 (17 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from lythos-labs

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get lythoskill-project-scribe running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying lythoskill-project-scribe?

CallGet help
Cite this page

lythoskill-project-scribe. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/lythos-labs-lythoskill-project-scribe (last updated 2026-10-24)