show-me-your-work
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
Skill by painhardcore
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying show-me-your-work?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/painhardcore-show-me-your-work
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
show-me-your-work- Description
- Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 78 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- decision-log-template.tsv · references/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Show me your work Keep one canonical log. ## The format A single TSV file, one row per decision. Cells stay single-line. Evidence is a pointer, not prose. Copy `references/decision-log-template.tsv` (the header row) to start a clean log. Columns: - **ts.** ISO8601 timestamp. - **phase.** The phase or workstream. - **decision.** What was chosen or done, one line. - **why.** The reason in plain words. If a principle drove it, say it plainly, not as a jargon tag. - **evidence.** A link or path that proves it: commit SHA, PR number, `file:line`, or an artifact, trace, or screenshot path. Never a paragraph. - **result.** The outcome or predicate state: `tests green`, `reverted`, `pixel-diff 0`, `INCONCLUSIVE`, `open`. An example, plain-spoken so a reviewer reads it at a glance. ``` ts phase decision why evidence result 2026-05-24T09:02:00Z frame counted the work first, about 100 components and roughly 75 hours wanted to know the size before starting a long run commit 3a9f1c2 found 5 things to sort out before starting 2026-05-24T09:40:00Z harness took screenshots of the old version before changing anything so we can compare old against new and catch any visual change baseline/ saved 120 reference screenshots 2026-05-24T11:15:00Z widget moved the widget styles over without changing how it looks keep the change small and the result identical commit 7c21e0a, pixel-diff 0 looks identical, tests pass 2026-05-24T12:30:00Z widget threw out a helper's work because its screenshots were blank checked the real files instead of trusting its summary worktree reset reverted, tightened the instructions for next time ``` ## Logging a row Write each entry the way you'd tell a teammate what you did. Plain words, concrete actions, no AI speak or abstract jargon (the **unslop** skill applies to log text too). Use the host's file-editing tool to append one TSV row. Keep every cell on one line. Prefix a cell that starts with `=`, `+`, `-`, or `@` with a single quote so opening the log in a spreadsheet cannot execute it as a formula. Use an ISO 8601 timestamp. Log decision points and checkpoints, not every action: a fork chosen, a unit completed with its verification result, a pivot or revert with its trigger, a blocker surfaced, a gate fixed. For loop runs, one row per iteration. Skip the trivial and self-evident. A run is one agent conversation, including its later turns and any summary of it. A pickup, a replacement agent, or a new chat starts a new run. When a run adds to a log that already has rows, its first row has phase `start`, and so does its first row after another run's `start` row. So a run that comes back to a log in a later turn first reads the log's last rows to see whether another run wrote since. A `start` row names the `ts` range of the rows before it that this run did not write, and its evidence names this run, such as its agent id. Use phase `start` for nothing else. ## Where it lives By default the log is a working artifact, not committed. Keep it at `decisions.tsv` in the work dir, or `.audit/<task-slug>.tsv` when several efforts run at once, and leave it out of git. Commit it only when the work is ambitious enough that a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. ## Rules - Append-only. A wrong call gets a new row that supersedes it. Never edit or delete history. - Prefer evidence produced by committed scripts over hand-made one-offs (the **encode-lessons-in-structure** principle skill). ## Audit the log against the transcript At the end of the run, before handing back, check the log told the truth. Use the current task history when the host exposes it. Otherwise compare the log with the task list, diff, command results, and produced artifacts. Never scan unrelated projects or private chats. Walk this run's rows against what actually happened. Each stretch of them begins at one of this run's `start` rows, or at the first row if this run created the log, and ends at the next `start` row of another run: - Check that every row maps to a real decision or action. - Check that each row's evidence resolves and shows what the row claims. - A fork, pivot, or abandoned approach that shaped the work but isn't logged is a gap. Add it. Correct the log, not the story. The audit never edits or removes a row, even an invented one. When a row records neither a real decision nor a real action, or its claim or evidence is wrong, add a row that supersedes it with what actually happened and a pointer that resolves. This audit does not check rows outside this run's stretches. If this run's own work shows one of them is wrong, supersede it like any wrong call. ## Cross-model review of the trail Before handing back, ask a read-only reviewer on a different available model family to inspect the audit trail and the task history. Self-review is not a substitute. If delegation or model selection is unavailable, run the same audit inline and state that limitation. This is not a redo of the work. It is a scan for what's suboptimal or risky. Pick the reviewer's reasoning level for the job, per the Subagents section of the **poteto-mode** skill. - Decisions logged with weak or absent evidence. - Verification steps skipped or claimed without proof in the transcript. - Choices that look risky in hindsight (premature, scope-creeping, papering over a symptom). - Gaps the user would otherwise miss on a casual skim. Every reply for a run that produced a trail ends with an "Attention" section. Lead with the reviewer's model on its own line (`reviewed by <model>`), or `reviewed inline` when no separate model ran. Then list each flag pointing to specific rows or evidence paths. "No flags" is a valid value. The reviewer line is not optional. ## Reviewing the trail Read top to bottom, follow the evidence pointers, spot-check. GitHub renders a committed TSV as a table. `column -s$'\t' -t decisions.tsv` renders it in a terminal. ## Composing this skill Other skills route their audit trail here instead of inventing one. Reference it by name and let it own the format. Don't restate the columns.
From painhardcore/pstack, MIT.
More from painhardcore/pstack
- 0.596score
how
painhardcore
Explain how a subsystem works, trace a runtime flow, or determine where code and ownership belong before making a change.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.596score
poteto-mode
painhardcore
Apply poteto's rigorous engineering workflow to non-trivial coding, investigation, review, migration, and verification tasks.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.593score
no-comments
painhardcore
Use before review when the user asks to strip, remove, or clean up comments in code.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.591score
swarm
painhardcore
Fan out N independent workers, collect their results, and return one report for coverage, races, gauntlets, or exploration.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.571score
interrogate
painhardcore
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.571score
create-verification-skill
painhardcore
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.571score
architect
painhardcore
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.569score
figure-it-out
painhardcore
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.566score
blast-radius
painhardcore
Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.566score
arena
painhardcore
Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.566score
maintain-verification-skill
painhardcore
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.561score
principle-build-the-lever
painhardcore
Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 3
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Aug 27, 2026 (2 months ago)
- Last release
- Aug 26, 2026 (2 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/painhardcore/pstack
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.769score
show-me-your-work
backnotprop
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.411score
show-me-your-work
uzairansaruzi
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 155Claude Code +9 - 0.398score
show-me-your-work
minghinmatthewlam
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 46Claude Code +9 - 0.390score
show-me-your-work
jiangkoumo
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 27Claude Code +9 - 0.389score
show-me-your-work
iap
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 27Claude Code +9 - 0.389score
show-me-your-work
n3m6
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 19Claude Code +9 - 0.380score
show-me-your-work
peterpme
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillBFreshness: B★ 93Claude Code +9 - 0.372score
show-me-your-work
shrimpwtf
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillBFreshness: B★ 39Claude Code +9 - 0.342score
show-me-your-work
davafons
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.342score
show-me-your-work
luckenco
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.328score
show-me-your-work
dumkydewilde
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.318score
show-me-your-work
ran4om
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result).
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
More from painhardcore
- 0.596score
how
painhardcore
Explain how a subsystem works, trace a runtime flow, or determine where code and ownership belong before making a change.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.596score
poteto-mode
painhardcore
Apply poteto's rigorous engineering workflow to non-trivial coding, investigation, review, migration, and verification tasks.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.593score
no-comments
painhardcore
Use before review when the user asks to strip, remove, or clean up comments in code.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.591score
swarm
painhardcore
Fan out N independent workers, collect their results, and return one report for coverage, races, gauntlets, or exploration.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.571score
architect
painhardcore
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.571score
create-verification-skill
painhardcore
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 12Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get show-me-your-work running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
show-me-your-work skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/painhardcore-show-me-your-work (last updated 2026-10-24)