Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

code-review

Systematic code analysis with evidence collection

Skill by SimHacker

IndexedMIT★ 60
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying code-review?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/simhacker-code-review

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Systematic code analysis with evidence collection

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/code-review

What's inside

Skill name
code-review
Description
Systematic code analysis with evidence collection
License
MIT
Instructions
153 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Agent Skills spec issues

  • allowed-tools: must be a space-separated string

Files (7)

  • CARD.yml
  • GLANCE.yml
  • README.md
  • REVIEW.md.tmpl
  • REVIEW.yml.tmpl
  • SKILL.md
  • skill-snitch-report.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Code Review

> *"Read with intent. Question with purpose. Document with care."*

Systematic code analysis with evidence collection. Code review IS an [adventure](../adventure/) — the codebase is the dungeon, findings are clues.

## Review Process

```
READ → NOTE ISSUES → CLASSIFY → REPORT
```

### Step 1: Setup
1. Create REVIEW.yml
2. Identify files to review
3. Define focus areas

### Step 2: Overview
1. List all changed files
2. Read PR/commit description
3. Note initial impressions

### Step 3: Deep Review
For each file:
1. Read the code
2. Check against criteria
3. Note findings
4. Run relevant checks

### Step 4: Verification
1. Run tests
2. Run linters
3. Check regressions

### Step 5: Synthesize
1. Compile findings
2. Prioritize issues
3. Generate REVIEW.md
4. State recommendation

## Finding Severity

| Level | Symbol | Meaning | Action |
|-------|--------|---------|--------|
| Blocking | 🚫 | Must fix before merge | Request changes |
| Important | ⚠️ | Should fix or explain | Request changes |
| Minor | 💡 | Nice to fix | Comment only |
| Praise | 🎉 | Good work! | Celebrate |

## Finding Types

- **Security** — Injection, auth, sensitive data
- **Correctness** — Logic errors, edge cases
- **Performance** — N+1 queries, memory leaks
- **Maintainability** — Clarity, DRY, naming
- **Style** — Formatting, conventions

## Review Checklist

### Security
- Input validation
- Output encoding
- Authentication/authorization
- Sensitive data handling
- Injection vulnerabilities
- Timing attacks

### Correctness
- Logic errors
- Edge cases handled
- Null/undefined handling
- Error handling
- Race conditions
- Resource cleanup

### Maintainability
- Code clarity
- Appropriate comments
- Consistent naming
- DRY (no duplication)
- Single responsibility
- Testability

### Performance
- Algorithmic complexity
- Memory usage
- Database queries
- Caching
- Unnecessary operations

## Core Files

### REVIEW.yml

```yaml
review:
  name: "PR #123: Add user authentication"
  status: "in_progress"
  
findings:
  blocking:
    - id: "B1"
      file: "src/auth/login.ts"
      line: 45
      type: "security"
      summary: "Timing attack vulnerability"
      
  important: []
  minor: []
  praise: []

verification:
  tests: { ran: true, passed: true }
  linter: { ran: true, passed: false, issues: 3 }
```

### REVIEW.md

Formatted document with:

From SimHacker/moollm, MIT.

More from SimHacker/moollm

Signals

Stars
60
Forks
5
Open issues
1
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 20, 2026 (17 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from SimHacker

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get code-review running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying code-review?

CallGet help
Cite this page

code-review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/simhacker-code-review (last updated 2026-10-24)