systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Skill by tim-hub
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying systematic-debugging?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/tim-hub-systematic-debugging
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Node.js package
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/systematic-debugging
What's inside
- Skill name
systematic-debugging- Description
- Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 37 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (6)
- SKILL.md
- condition-based-waiting-example.ts
- condition-based-waiting.md
- defense-in-depth.md
- find-polluter.sh
- root-cause-tracing.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Systematic Debugging ## Find the root cause 1. Read the error and the full stack trace. Note line numbers, paths, and codes. The answer is often already in there. 2. Reproduce it. Establish the exact steps and whether it happens every time. Not reproducible means gather more data, not guess. 3. Check what changed — recent commits, new dependencies, config, environment. 4. In a system with multiple components, instrument every boundary before proposing anything: log what enters each component, what leaves it, and whether config and environment propagated. Run once, then read the evidence to find which layer breaks. 5. Trace the bad value backward — where it originated, what passed it in — until you reach the source. Fix there, not at the symptom. ## Compare against what works 6. Find similar working code in this codebase. 7. If you are applying a pattern, read the reference implementation completely. Skimming it produces bugs. 8. List every difference between the working case and the broken one, however small. ## Test one hypothesis 9. State it plainly: X is the root cause because Y. 10. Make the smallest change that tests it. One variable at a time. 11. If it did not work, form a new hypothesis. Do not stack another fix on top of the last one. 12. Say plainly when you do not understand something rather than proceeding as if you do. ## Fix at the source 13. Write a failing test that reproduces the bug, before fixing anything. 14. Make one change, at the root cause. No bundled refactoring, no while-I-am-here improvements. 15. Verify: the test passes, nothing else broke, the original symptom is gone. 16. Count your failed fixes. At three, stop fixing and question the architecture with your partner. Fixes that each surface a new problem somewhere else mean the design is wrong, not the hypothesis. If investigation shows the cause is genuinely environmental, timing-dependent, or external, document what you ruled out, add appropriate handling and monitoring, and say so explicitly. Terminal state: invoke test-driven-development to lock the fix in with a regression test. Depth: root-cause-tracing.md, defense-in-depth.md, condition-based-waiting.md
From tim-hub/superpowers-slim, MIT.
More from tim-hub/superpowers-slim
- 0.546score
finishing-a-development-branch
tim-hub
Use when implementation is complete and tests pass, and the work needs integrating
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.541score
requesting-code-review
tim-hub
Use when work is implemented and needs review before merging
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.541score
receiving-code-review
tim-hub
Use when code review feedback has arrived, before implementing the suggestions
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.521score
verification-before-completion
tim-hub
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating a PR
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.521score
writing-plans
tim-hub
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.516score
executing-plans
tim-hub
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute task by task
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.514score
brainstorming
tim-hub
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Aug 3, 2026 (2 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/tim-hub/superpowers-slim
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from tim-hub
- 0.546score
finishing-a-development-branch
tim-hub
Use when implementation is complete and tests pass, and the work needs integrating
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.541score
requesting-code-review
tim-hub
Use when work is implemented and needs review before merging
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.541score
receiving-code-review
tim-hub
Use when code review feedback has arrived, before implementing the suggestions
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.530score
Body Fat Calculator
tim-hub
Estimates body fat percentage with the US Navy method and keeps your values in the browser.
ArtifactNo sign-upIn-browser★ 1health lifestyle - 0.521score
verification-before-completion
tim-hub
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating a PR
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.521score
writing-plans
tim-hub
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get systematic-debugging running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
systematic-debugging skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/tim-hub-systematic-debugging (last updated 2026-10-24)